http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/ Taking note of the good things Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:45:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-3754 Erica Sun, 03 Aug 2008 18:03:41 +0000 http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-3754 I love love the darker storm clouds... (I LOVE clouds) I love love the darker storm clouds… (I LOVE clouds)

]]> http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-3061 Jamie Sat, 10 May 2008 15:37:11 +0000 http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-3061 Great stuff. Found this after Googling 'photography post processing' since I'm looking for tips on making my images 'pop'! Great stuff. Found this after Googling ‘photography post processing’ since I’m looking for tips on making my images ‘pop’!

]]> http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-2748 jeremy Sat, 08 Mar 2008 04:08:18 +0000 http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-2748 Very well said Judy. I do think your theory of accessibility is right on the mark. Thanks for the great comments! Very well said Judy. I do think your theory of accessibility is right on the mark. Thanks for the great comments!

]]> http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-2739 Judy Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:15:23 +0000 http://www.whatsgottastay.com/before-after-post-processing/#comment-2739 I have always thought the so-called purists who denounce the use of Photoshop are off the mark. The traditional tools of film photography printing and processing also allow for such adjustments. Granted they took more time and effort, and in some cases resources, but the end result was often the same. Could it be they dislike how the digital image processing tools make the art form more accessible to more people? I do love the finished piece. the boosted saturation of the building against the stormy sky is a perfect example of how a photo is truly worth 1000 words! I have always thought the so-called purists who denounce the use of Photoshop are off the mark. The traditional tools of film photography printing and processing also allow for such adjustments. Granted they took more time and effort, and in some cases resources, but the end result was often the same. Could it be they dislike how the digital image processing tools make the art form more accessible to more people? I do love the finished piece. the boosted saturation of the building against the stormy sky is a perfect example of how a photo is truly worth 1000 words!

]]>